#29 instead of Balmer: Curtis Lofton maybe? He seems to be winning the starting position at MLB in Atlanta, and he could've competed for the TED spot here, I guess. I can't see anyone else who could've earned a starting spot.

#39 instead of Rachal: kinda stuck here. I don't see anyone near 39 who could've taken a starting spot. There are a bunch of WRs in that vicinity, but doubt they could've beaten out BJ and Bruce.

We basically got the best o-lineman and d-lineman at each pick, and those are the positions that can always use depth. Lofton would've been nice, and I was actually hoping we'd get him. At this point, I would've chosen Lofton instead of Balmer.

Also, I wasn't happy with the R.Smith and C.Wallace picks and I'm still not happy. Hopefully they prove me wrong, but Smith is too slow to play CB and Wallace just gets manhandled too often. Not sure who I would've selected instead, though, as I haven't been following the progress of later-round guys around the league.


_________________________________________________________________